<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Van-Laza Blogs &#187; Guardian Weekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leatleat.com/tag/guardian-weekly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leatleat.com</link>
	<description>Online Book Of Technology, Sport, Auto &#38; LIfestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Travelling</title>
		<link>http://www.leatleat.com/2009/04/travelling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leatleat.com/2009/04/travelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>qobear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traveller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leatleat.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I write this I’m getting ready to go on holiday.  Part of me wants to go.  Another part of me really hates the airport, queues, security side of things, as well as feeling guilty as I look down at my expanding carbon footprint. Will a review of the Guardian Weekly archive make me feel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9" title="woman_travelling" src="http://www.leatleat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/woman_travelling1.jpg" alt="woman_travelling" width="299" height="448" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As I write this I’m getting ready to go on holiday.  Part of me wants to go.  Another part of me really hates the airport, queues, security side of things, as well as feeling guilty as I look down at my expanding carbon footprint.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-59"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Will a review of the Guardian Weekly archive make me feel any better about this?  I fear not.  Whether you see yourself as a traveller or a tourist, the news isn’t good.  In the archive, <em>travellers</em> are still associated with <em>tales</em>, but they are most strongly linked to <em>stranded</em> and <em>delays</em>.  Even more depressingly, the <em>tourist </em>is just a consumer of travel: <em>brochures, attractions, resorts, hotels</em> and <em>spots</em>, are all on offer, along with the hassle of <em>visas</em> and <em>tourist traps</em>.  Yet despite all this, <em>tourists</em> still <em>flock</em> to places which offer luxury and facilities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You might have noticed that everything so far has been about the destination rather than the journey. What does the Guardian Weekly say about how we get from A to B?  The most frequent means of transport reported in this newspaper are: <em>train</em>(s) (2,830), <em>plane</em>(s) (2,796), <em>ship</em>(s) (2,311), <em>boat</em>(s) (2,028), and <em>truck</em>(s) (1,324).  <em>Lorries</em>(s) (604), <em>bicycle</em>(s) (359), <em>bike</em>(s) (321), and old fashioned <em>aeroplane</em>(s) (135) are much less used.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Is the fact that trains are more in the news than planes a sign that we’re getting greener?  Unfortunately, it seems not.  <em>Train</em>(s) goes with: <em>robber, derailed, Biggs</em> (Ronnie Biggs – one of the Great Train robbers), <em>crash, bombings</em> and <em>collided</em>.  Nothing very green there.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Are planes greener or safer?  It doesn’t look like it.  Closest associates of <em>plane</em> are <em>spotters</em> (harmless enough unless the authorities think you are spying), but this is followed by <em>crashed, crash, landed</em> and <em>stupid</em> (the anti-flying protest organisation Plane Stupid), while with <em>planes</em> it’s oddly military: <em>grounded, warships, helicopters, bombed, satellites, artillery, bases, patrol</em>.<br />
Are ships and boats better?  Not from a news perspective –  they tend to <em>run aground</em>, or <em>sink</em>.  Travel by <em>boat</em> and you’re most likely to find yourself in something that is <em>overloaded, capsized</em> or <em>sinking</em>. Go on a <em>truck</em>? Only if you want to travel with a <em>bomb</em> or <em>explosives</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">How will I be travelling?  I wish I could say it was on foot or by bike, but I’m afraid that this year I will be joining many others who are waiting in the queue at airport security.</p>
<h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li>travelling</li></ul><!-- SEO SearchTerms Tagging 2 Plugin -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leatleat.com/2009/04/travelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

